Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all be certain legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The plenty of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made apparent that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties inside the interim period. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
Most of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be out there online through the Caselaw Access Project.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it's generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not influence the department of his/her innocence.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in such-and-these neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the community seeking to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s well worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, read more however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
Carrying out a case legislation search may be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, including:
Summaries of cases that condition the lives of youthful individuals, making sure a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
Normally, only an appeal accepted by the court of previous resort will resolve these types of differences and, For numerous reasons, these kinds of appeals are frequently not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.